Just a note for anyone on my LJ flist who isn't following M.E.A.D.: the end of the world is coming on 13 June 2007. I hope you'll join us.
Leave a comment
![]() | You are viewing Log in Create a LiveJournal Account Learn more | Explore LJ Culture Entertainment Life Music News & Politics Technology |



| |
Brian |
Steve |
kcf |
MattD, Trinalor |
| 0 |
0-2 = hate it | 0-4 - varying degree of bad, not recommended | ||
| 1 |
1-5 - varying levels of avoid at all cost. | A 1 is something I've never actually read; the editorial process is good for something! Plus, would you really trust me if I couldn't tell a 1 in advance and wasn't smart enough to avoid it? | ||
| 2 |
A 2 is a book that feels unworthy of an author, as though they're just repeating their own past work while adding nothing new. | |||
| 3 |
3-4 = dislike it | A 3 is a book that feels like an experiment gone wrong -- the author (who may well be someone whose other works I'd rate much higher) tried to do something new and it just didn't work at all, to the extent that I had trouble finishing or didn't finish the book. | ||
| 4 |
A 4 is a book that is generally competent but not particularly good in any way, or perhaps tries to be something and fails: tries to be funny but is dull; tries to be exciting but is cliched, etc. | |||
| 5 |
5-6 = it's ok | 5 - equally bad and good, not likely to recommend | A 5 is a book that had promise but reads like a first draft -- a moderate-to-good idea in need of more work and editing. | |
| 6 |
6 - A supremely flawed work but there is SOMETHING to recommend. For example 1) a continuation of a larger theme in a series. 2) one truly memorable character, scene or moment. | 6-7.5 - A good book with some obvious flaws or other factors that I didn't care for. Recommended with qualifiers. | A 6 is a book that had one or two enjoyable aspects, but suffers from one or more serious flaws: predictability and cliches are common ones; unsympathetic or unformed characters are another. Solid amateur fiction, or a typical first novel. | |
| 7 |
7's - Flaws are noticeable but there is a lot to like here. A work that shows promise. An author that bears watching. | 7-8 = like it | A 7 is a good book -- something I enjoyed reading and that has some above-average aspects that kept me going and gave the book character. It is not so good however that I have any plans to re-read it. |
|
| 7.5 |
7.5-9 - superb book with very few flaws. Highly recommended | |||
| 8 |
8's - All around solid story. | An 8 is a book that is well done all-around in terms of character, setting, writing and plot, that brings some originality and character to the table. It may also be a book that rates really high on the pure enjoyment scale, that does several things so well that I can imagine wanting to re-read it in a few years. | ||
| 8.5 |
8.5-10 = love it! | |||
| 9 |
9's - Near perfect, there may be flaws but they pale in comparison to the strengths of the book but they may be worth mentioning. | A 9 is everything an 8 is but adds a deeper sense of emotional resonance and intellectual stimulation. It's something that made me both feel and think strongly in a way that I had not before. | ||
| 9.5 |
||||
| 10 |
10 - A writer firing on all cylinders telling a story to the absolute best of their abilities. There cant be just one thing to recommend but there has to be many things. | 10 - the perfect book in every way. I'm bad with absolutes, so I doubt I'd ever give rank higher than 9 | A 10 is one of the classics, something that feels superb, unique and that has stood the test of time. It's not so much a matter of perfection as that the flaws are drowned out by the positives and the significance of the work. |